Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Omniscience | dazai | 9-1 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
Jeskai Control | scipios | 8-1 | None |
Jeskai Control | soulstrong | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 7-1 | None |
Unknown Archetype | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Azorius Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Azorius Artifacts | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Azorius Omniscience | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Jeskai Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Azorius Control | ignotus97 | 7-2 | None |
4 Color Beanstalk , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Control , Azorius Convoke , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph
Meticulous Archive ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Colorless average: 63.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Meticulous Archive is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 36.73 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Meticulous Archive has a win rate of 75.0%, making it 0.8% better than other 0-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Voice of Victory | Creature — Human Bard | 21 | 79.8% | 10 |
Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 46 | 79.7% | 23 |
Bushwhack | Sorcery | 9 | 78.8% | 5 |
Cache Grab | Instant | 9 | 78.8% | 5 |
Eddymurk Crab | Creature — Elemental Crab | 9 | 78.8% | 5 |
Seed of Hope | Instant | 9 | 78.8% | 5 |
Tolarian Terror | Creature — Serpent | 9 | 78.8% | 5 |
Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 52 | 76.6% | 22 |
Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 83 | 76.3% | 33 |
Keen-Eyed Curator | Creature — Raccoon Scout | 8 | 76.2% | 4 |
Cards that perform better with Meticulous Archive than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 8 | 89.2% | 75.2% | +14.0% |
Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 1 | 6 | 85.2% | 75.9% | +9.3% |
Leyline Binding | Enchantment | 6 | 11 | 82.4% | 73.9% | +8.5% |
Overlord of the Hauntwoods | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 11 | 82.4% | 74.2% | +8.1% |
Zur, Eternal Schemer | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 3 | 9 | 78.6% | 73.0% | +5.6% |
Sunfall | Sorcery | 5 | 20 | 79.5% | 74.3% | +5.3% |
Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 24 | 81.3% | 76.3% | +5.0% |
High Noon | Enchantment | 2 | 8 | 77.8% | 73.0% | +4.8% |
Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 1 | 8 | 78.6% | 74.0% | +4.6% |
This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 14 | 79.0% | 74.9% | +4.2% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Domain Zur Overlords | 789 | 60.1% | 47.8% |
Azorius Tempo | 394 | 99.0% | 41.9% |
Azorius Omniscience | 352 | 99.7% | 51.4% |
Azorius Control | 312 | 82.1% | 49.2% |
Mono White Tokens | 100 | 16.4% | 41.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.